The New Republic

The New Republic

Clarence Thomas Has Lost the Plot

The associate justice’s dissent in the tariffs case deserves some extra attention, because it his hopelessly uncoupled from law, history, and the Constitution.

The New Republic's avatar
Matt Ford's avatar
The New Republic and Matt Ford
Feb 24, 2026
∙ Paid
Supreme Court Associate Justice Clarence Thomas covers his face as he waits for the opportunity to leave the stage at the conclusion of Trump’s second inauguration ceremonies.
Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Justice Clarence Thomas’s preferred theory of constitutional interpretation is often said to be originalist, but it may be more accurately described as personalist. To Thomas, almost every American judge who served over the past two centuries wasted their lives and careers. Rather than try to determine the Constitution’s mea…

User's avatar

Continue reading this post for free, courtesy of The New Republic.

Or purchase a paid subscription.
Matt Ford's avatar
A guest post by
Matt Ford
Staff writer, The New Republic.
Subscribe to Matt
© 2026 The New Republic · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture